🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic discussions with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy produced results, and shared new appeals had originated from go-betweens to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations exercised their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Situation

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions restart.

Trump recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the 12-day war showed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently attempted to enforce their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and stays the ultimate solution to address disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We acquired numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the country in the aftermath of this assault."