🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Staggering Sum in Compensation from Clearing House Regarding Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has announced it is seeking damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine. The Substantial Demand According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand. European Union officials will decide later this week on a plan to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and financial stability. The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves. A Clash Over Legality European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European countries following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened retaliatory measures, including confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key role in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan. Strategic Positioning With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States." Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions. Enforcement Challenges While judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm. European Safeguards EU officials indicated they are working on steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would solely be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year war. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful message that when you cause all this damage to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."